Critique #109 — Rhiannon Rose

Kevin Andrew Murphy January 28th, 2007

The first thing I noticed was the road and the horizon and how the dark road just sort of went on and on until it took a sharp left curve at some shiny building down the way. The second thing I noticed was that I’d noticed this; and then my engine, rumbling, all set and good to go. Idling, even.

If the engine went off, did I go off? Hey, the sky, the sky was wide and kind of a purple color, you know, and shiny with clouds like a chrome finish misted over with patches of bubbly fog. Could I fall off? The road was just as wide, but darker; concrete and asphalt double-striped yellow like the back of a snake, corralled into a line by the paler concrete of the sidewalk and the red no-parking paint.

5 Responses to “Critique #109 — Rhiannon Rose”

  1. Gyp Orienson 28 Jan 2007 at 6:18 am

    Is this Siobhagn? Because if it isn’t (or someone similar), then I am totally lost.

  2. Debbie Whiteon 28 Jan 2007 at 2:29 pm

    I have to admit that this left me totally confused. I couldn’t get an anchor point on what was going on. I read it through slowly two more times in an attempt to figure it out. The only thing that seemed to fit all the clues is that the viewpoint character is a car and that this is the first time the car has ever been started (thus, all the questions about its existence). The question, then, is why are we on a road instead of a car lot or something.

  3. Kevin Andrew Murphyon 28 Jan 2007 at 3:20 pm

    Rhiannon,

    The trouble here isn’t the individual lines so much as the fact that you’ve stacked up various evocative lines rather haphazardly. If the person is disoriented and just realizing it, I as reader don’t want them waxing poetic about snakeline roads unless there’s some strong sense of urgency pulling me along through the stream-of-consciousness.

    That’s the trouble with stream-of-consciousness–it can be interesting and evocative if done just so, but if not, runs the risk of just sounding like stoned waffle. I was with you for the first paragraph, but you lost me by the second since the image didn’t sharpen up and start to tell us a story. A stoned person driving on a road somewhere doesn’t interest me enough to turn the page.

  4. Rhiannon Roseon 30 Jan 2007 at 8:39 pm

    Okay! Thank you all. I got ahead of myself, though - I think I need critique on the whole story before I can fix the first lines, because I’m no longer sure the story can go anywhere interesting.

    Gyp - nope, it’s not.

  5. Gyp Orienson 31 Jan 2007 at 4:37 am

    Oh! Then I really had no idea what was happening. Sorry.

Trackback URI | Comments RSS

Leave a Reply