Critique #91: Theo Neel

Katharine Kerr October 13th, 2006

Toaster.  That’s what they call me.  The Department of Social
Services and Family Preservation placed me here six months
ago, and they — the family I’m with, that is — haven’t given me
a proper name yet, unless you count “toaster.”  But if you count
toaster, you’d have to count metal-head, bucket of bolts, piece of
shit, hey you and Dolores.

But what’s in a name, Shakespeare said.  It doesn’t matter to me.
Named or not named, my job is the same:  “preserve the family unit
by assuring children’s safety and helping the family maintain
self-sufficiency.”

“Hey toaster!  Have you seen my geometry book?” George, the ten-
year old shouts with a mouthful of peanut butter and jelly
sandwich.

I’ve learned that he’s not asking me if I have comprehended the
book with my visuals.  He’s asking me if I know its location.  (I
learned that nuance of language by having a pot thrown at me; the
pot did not survive the lesson intact.)

5 Responses to “Critique #91: Theo Neel”

  1. Daniel Woodson 14 Oct 2006 at 9:14 am

    Hey Theo.

    Well, I thought this was quite funny (as such, I hope it was meant to be). If I’ve got it right, the concept is interesting (robot/cyborg etc sent to keep order in a family), and I’d certainly turn the page.

    Only a couple of things. Firstly, I’m still note quite sure whether the main character is a bog-standard robot, or maybe a cyborg (I think I’ve got the terminology right - cyborg being a robot with a human brain, or something?). It seems to be a robot because of the whole ‘have you seen my geometry book’ thing, but then why would a robot be quoting Shakespeare? Indeed, why would a robot lament the lack of a ‘proper name’ in the first place? Then again, I suppose if it’s AI it might well have feelings too… sorry, I’m just thinking aloud now.

    The only other thing was ‘count metal-head, bucket of bolts, piece of shit, hey you and Dolores’. Though I liked it, ‘piece of shit’ did seem out of place to me - it’s the one and only swear word, and it’s surrounded by far more innocuous names like ‘bucket of bolts’. I always think you have to start as you mean to go on when it comes to swearing, and I highly doubt that people who would say ‘piece of shit’ would also say ‘bucket of bolts’.

    Nevertheless, I liked this.

  2. tchernabyeloon 15 Oct 2006 at 12:06 pm

    I like the light tone of this. You set the scene pretty well. The only quibble I think I have is the mention of “comprehended the book with my visuals”. Comprehended felt like the wrong word. But highlighting that human imprecision of language is perfect.

    I’d read on.

  3. Vivian Francison 16 Oct 2006 at 12:35 am

    Theo,

    I liked this, esp. the incident in the last two paragraphs.

    There are two big topics in the second paragraph (how The POV feels about not having a name, except bad ones, and his purpose in life). I might consider giving both topics a little more elaboration, to give them their full potential. Right now, I feel like they are a little bit squashed.

    “…you’d have to count metal-head, bucket of bolts, piece of
    shit, hey you and Dolores.” You could try listing the names so they build up to the most intense (funniest, meanest) at the end. I don’t know if I’m missing a reference with Dolores.

  4. Sherwood Smithon 17 Oct 2006 at 10:27 pm

    I liked this a whole lot–the tone is nifty, the set-up interesting. Not too much detail, but enough to make the situation clear. I was hooked by “Toaster” and stayed hooked until the end.

  5. Erin Underwoodon 18 Oct 2006 at 9:22 am

    Hooked by the first word! You can’t beat that! :-)
    It’s definitely an exciting and interesting opening. I look forward to reading more.

Trackback URI | Comments RSS

Leave a Reply